The House of Representatives passed a bill that would get rid of the Government Pension Offset (GPO) and the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP).
Now it’s up to the Senate to vote on the provisions. The approved bill, known as the Social Security Fairness Act, aims to protect the benefits of individuals who have worked in both the public and private sectors and contributed to Social Security.
The bill’s co-author, Rep. Garret Graves (R-La.), stressed the importance of swift passage, saying, “There’s been some talk about trying to make it part of the end-of-year negotiation.” I believe that is a serious attempt to end it.
Given that the bill garnered nearly 300 votes in the House and has the potential to pass on its own, he is concerned about the potential delay. “Anything else is really putting us on a slow path toward death, and I think it’s on purpose,” he said.
Rep. Graves, Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), and Susan Collins (R-Maine) sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) urging them to review the bill and assist in its passage.
The first time in history, you can finish this bill.” We urge you to put the Social Security Fairness Act (H.R.82) to a vote in the U.S. Senate on behalf of the nearly 2.5 million retirees affected by WEP and GPO in every state across the country.
The Social Security Fairness act, a controversial bill
Many people on both sides of the political spectrum support it, which isn’t a surprise since Social Security is one of the few issues that gets support from both parties. However, the House’s handling of it has left many Republican lawmakers unhappy.
To get the legislation passed, lawmakers used a discharge petition, which allows members to bypass leadership and force its consideration. Typically, only members of the minority party use this type of measure, and it requires support from the majority party, a rare occurrence for such bills.
Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wis.) said he didn’t like the bill, but he didn’t say anything negative about it: “In a well-run Congress, no legislator signs a discharge petition if you’re a majority.” People never break that rule. The fact that 47 of my coworkers signed a petition to fire me demonstrates our complete lack of discipline.
Other experts, like Andrew Biggs, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, were also not sure if the bill would work or if it would come at the right time. “The government created the WEP and the GPO with limited data access, necessitating the creation of these straightforward regulations to accomplish tasks.”
Overall, the system operates fairly, ensuring that people receive fair treatment. That being said, it doesn’t always work fairly. According to the law of averages, unfair treatment of some individuals leads to unfair treatment of others. To address this issue, it is necessary to modify the formula rather than eliminating all the rules.
In summary, the WEP formula modifies Social Security worker benefits for individuals who receive “non-covered pensions,” yet remain eligible for benefits due to their other Social Security-covered wages.
A company that does not deduct Social Security taxes from your pay is the payer of a non-covered pension. This typically indicates that the company operates outside of the United States or is a state or local government entity. The GPO also implies that spouses receiving government pensions will receive a reduction in their income.
Read Also :- Say goodbye to taxes in the US: these people will not have to pay them in 2025